Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Szepesvary v Weston as trustee of the bankrupt estate of Aaron Szepesvary [2018] FCAFC 224 Appeal from: Szepesvary v Weston (Trustee), in the matter of Szepesvary (Bankrupt) (No 2) [2018] FCA 87
File number: VID 261 of 2018
Judges: PERRY, MOSHINSKY AND LEE JJ
Date of judgment: 13 December 2018
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY – application for annulment of bankruptcy – allegation sequestration order ought not have been made because no valid legal assignment of debt – application for annulment refused by primary judge – discussion of validity of assignment of debts and going behind a judgment in the context of an annulment application EQUITY – assignment of choses in action at law and in equity – notice given under s 134 of the Property Law Act 1958 (Vic) and assignment of chose in action effective at law but consideration of principle that assignment ineffective at law is effective in equity if for value EVIDENCE – late service and inadmissibility of evidence of affidavit evidence seeking to prove notice of assignment of debt and of hearing at which sequestration order was made – document providing notice accepted by primary judge has having been received by appellant – discussion of principled approach as to use of presumptions as to receipt of documents – acceptance of testimony of affiant when the affidavit was not before the Court – error not material –appeal dismissed
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 153A, 153B Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 55, 69, 160, 167 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 39.8 Property Law Act 1958 (Vic) s 134 Judicature Act 1873 (UK) s 25
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate