Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Accor Australia & New Zealand Hospitality Pty Ltd v Liv Pty Ltd (No 3) [2018] FCAFC 231 Appeal from: Accor Australia & New Zealand Hospitality Pty Ltd v Liv Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 554
File number: QUD 683 of 2015
Judges: GREENWOOD, BESANKO AND KATZMANN JJ
Date of judgment: 18 December 2018
Catchwords: COSTS – application seeking orders varying previous orders made by the Court dealing with the costs of a trial and of an appeal – where appellants (costs applicants) seek a variation so that the respondents (costs respondents) pay the costs of the costs applicants, fixed in an amount to be determined by the Court – where costs applicants seek an order that the costs respondents pay the costs applicants' costs of and incidental to their application for an order for lump sum costs – where Court considers it appropriate that the matter be decided on the papers without an oral hearing COSTS – whether order for lump sum costs is appropriate – consideration of evidence adduced by the costs applicants' costs' expert in order to inform a decision on whether an order for lump sum costs is appropriate – whether order for lump sum costs will eliminate the time and likely substantial costs associated with a full taxation of costs – where considerable delay in the costs applicants' application for an order for lump sum costs – whether delay in the costs applicants' application is outweighed by the factors which favour an award of lump sum costs and which provide strong support for a lump sum order for costs – whether hearing on quantum of lump sum costs order ought to be heard by the primary judge
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate