Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Belan v National Union of Workers – New South Wales Branch [2018] FCAFC 239 File number: NSD 173 of 2018
Judges: RARES, PERRY AND CHARLESWORTH JJ
Date of judgment: 21 December 2018
Catchwords: STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – whether "any court of the Commonwealth" can mean a body not exercising the judicial power of the Commonwealth" – whether statute precluding admissibility of evidence before royal commission in any court of the Commonwealth applies to proceedings in the Fair Work Commission STATUTORY INTERPRETATION –- whether disadvantage caused "for or on account of" use of transcript of evidence given in royal commission by Fair Work Commission
Legislation: Constitution Ch III, s 71 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) 140 Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) Pt 3.2, ss 387, 570, 575 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 20 Insurance Act 1973 (Cth) s 25A Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Royal Commissions Act 1902 (Cth) ss 6DD, 6M, 6N, 6P
Cases cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v DB Management Pty Ltd (2000) 199 CLR 321 Baker v Patrick Projects Pty Ltd (2014) 226 FCR 302 Nick Belan v National Union of Workers - New South Wales Branch [2016] FWC 8538 Nick Belan v National Union of Workers–New South Wales Branch [2016] FWC 8538 Nick Belan v National Union of Workers–New South Wales Branch [2017] FWC 5027 Nick Belan v National Union of Workers–New South Wales Branch [2018] FWCFB 94 X v Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (2007) 226 CLR 630
Date of hearing: 22 August 2018
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate