Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Fahme v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 41 Appeal from: Fahme v Minister for Immigration [2018] FCCA 1180
File number: NSD 884 of 2018
Judges: RARES, PERRAM AND FARRELL JJ
Date of judgment: 1 March 2019
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for Constitutional writ relief – whether Administrative Appeals Tribunal had jurisdiction to entertain an application for review of a Part 5-reviewable decision – where application for review was made after expiry of shorter period of time under Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 4.10(1)(a) but before expiry of longer period under Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 347(1)(b)(i)
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 29 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 338, 347, 348 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 4.10
Cases cited: Beni v Minister [2018] FCAFC 228 Ex parte Currie; Re Dempsey (1969) 70 SR (NSW) 443; 91 WN (NSW) 34; [1970] 1 NSWR 617 Fernando v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 97 FCR 407 John Fairfax & Sons Ltd v Police Tribunal of New South Wales (1986) 5 NSWLR 465 Palmer v Clarke (1989) 19 NSWLR 158 Tay v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2010) 183 FCR 163 Xie v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 172
Date of hearing: 1 March 2019
Registry: New South Wales
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate