Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kraues v Office of Migration Agents Registration Authority [2019] FCAFC 52 Appeal from: Kraues v Migration Agents Registration Authority [2018] FCA 664
File numbers: NSD 898 of 2018
Judges: MARKOVIC, THOMAS AND THAWLEY JJ
Date of judgment: 2 April 2019
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal from a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirming cancellation of registration of migration agent by the Migration Agents Registration Authority – whether the Migration Agents Registration Authority and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal had jurisdiction to investigate complaints and cancel registration – whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal failed to afford procedural fairness to the applicant – whether no evidence of client/agent relationship between the applicant and the miners – whether power to cancel registration under s 303 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) limited to complaints in relation to the "provision of immigration assistance" – whether the function of investigating complaints "in relation to" the provision of immigration assistance under s 316(1)(c) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) is limited to the actual provision of immigration assistance – whether the power provided by s 314 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) to prescribe a Code of Conduct is confined to prescribing standards of conduct only where "immigration assistance" is in fact given – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 15AA Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Pt 2 Div 3A, Pt 3 Divs 3, 3A, ss 276, 280, 281, 290, 303(1), 305, 305A, 305B, 305C, 306C, 308, 309(2), 314, 316(1), 317 Migration Agents Regulations 1998 (Cth) Sched 2
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate