Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hong v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 55 Appeal from: Hong v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1085
File number(s): NSD 1435 of 2018
Judge(s): LOGAN, BROMWICH AND WHEELAHAN JJ
Date of judgment: 5 April 2019
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from a decision of the Federal Court – where mandatory visa cancellation made pursuant to s 501(3A) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether the primary judge erred in failing to find that the Tribunal failed to consider a claim made by the applicant – whether the alleged claim was sufficiently raised on the material, evidence and submissions before the Tribunal – whether the primary judge erred in failing to find that the Tribunal's decision was legally unreasonable – no jurisdictional error identified – application dismissed.
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 2A, s 24Z, s 32, s 33, s 34J, s 35, s 39, s 40, s 43 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 476, 500, s 501CA
Cases cited: Applicant S395/2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2003) 216 CLR 473 Applicant S v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2004) 217 CLR 387 Attorney-General (NSW) v Quin (1990) 170 CLR 1 AYY17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 89 BCR16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 96; 248 FCR 456 Benjamin v Repatriation Commission [2001] FCA 1879; 70 ALD 622 Boddington v British Transport Police [1999] 2 AC 143 Brunskill v Sovereign Marine & General Insurance Co Ltd [1985] HCA 61; 62 ALR 53 CQG15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 146; 253 FCR 496 Dearman v Dearman (1908) 7 CLR 549 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 26; 214 CLR 496; 77 ALJR 1088 Fox v Percy [2003] HCA 22; 214 CLR 118 Goundar v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1203 Hospital Benefit Fund v Minister for Health (1992) 39 FCR 225 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34; 92 ALJR 780 Htun v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1802; 233 FCR 136 Jebb v Repatriation Commission (1988) 80 ALR 329 Kasupene v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 1609 Kuswardana v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1981) 35 ALR 186; 54 FLR 334 Maioha v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 216 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Home Affairs v Buadromo [2018] FCAFC 151; 362 ALR 48 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v DRP17 [2018] FCAFC 198 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZIAI (2009) 83 ALJR 1123 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16; 240 CLR 611 NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2004] FCAFC 263; 144 FCR 1 National Archives of Australia v Fernandes [2014] FCAFC 158; 233 FCR 478 Repatriation Commissioner v Warren [2008] FCAFC 64; 167 FCR 511 Shell Company of Australia Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1930) 44 CLR 530 Stead v State Government Insurance Commission (1986) 161 CLR 141 SZSHK v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCAFC 125; (2013) 138 ALD 26 The Hontestroom [1927] AC 37 Toia v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2009) 177 FCR 125 Viane v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 116; 162 ALD 13 Whisprun Pty Ltd v Dixon (2003) 200 ALR 447
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate