Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
DFQ17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 64 Appeal from: DFQ17 v Minister for Immigration [2018] FCCA 635
File number: NSD 369 of 2018
Judges: RARES, PERRAM AND FARRELL JJ
Date of judgment: 18 April 2019
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from Federal Circuit Court – whether Court erred in dismissing appeal from Administrative Appeals Tribunal – where Tribunal found it had no jurisdiction to review application made out of time – where letter notifying of refusal of visa by Minister sent to post office box address – whether post office box address was 'address for service' – whether letter 'stated' the time in which the application for review may be made STATUTES – Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 66, 494B – 'address for service' – 'state'
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) ss 28A, 36 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 66, 494B, 494C Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) regs 2.16, 4.31
Cases cited: Cao v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 586; 176 FCR 396 CGJ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1437 Chan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1292; 134 FCR 308 House of Peace Pty Ltd v Bankstown City Council [2000] NSWCA 44; 48 NSWLR 498 Polo/Lauren Company LP v Ziliani Holdings Pty Ltd [2008] FCAFC 195; 173 FCR 266 Sunrise Auto Limited v Commissioner of Taxation [1995] FCA 969; 61 FCR 446 SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] HCA 34; 347 ALR 405 SZVRO v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 421 Vetter v Lake Macquarie City Council [2001] HCA 12; 202 CLR 439 Zhan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 327; 128 FCR 469
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate