Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Parvin v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 86 Appeal from: Parvin v Minister for Immigration (No 2) [2016] FCCA 2120
File number: NSD 1929 of 2016
Judges: PERRAM, PERRY AND O'CALLAGHAN JJ
Date of judgment: 29 May 2019
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from a decision of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia which dismissed an appeal from a decision of the Migration Review Tribunal – where Tribunal did not disclose existence of a certificate under s 375A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where Tribunal had not disclosed certain items of information mentioned in the Tribunal's reasons – where appellant already knew that the Tribunal had confidential information to the effect that the appellant was not, and at all material times, had never been, in a genuine spousal relationship – where items of information not disclosed were subsumed in the proposition that the appellant was not, and at all material times, had never been, in a genuine spousal relationship
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 359A, 375A
Cases cited: Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Kumar (2009) 238 CLR 448 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Singh (2016) 244 FCR 305 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA; CQZ15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; BEG15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] HCA 3; (2019) 93 ALJR 252 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v WZARH (2015) 256 CLR 326 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Lam (2003) 214 CLR 1 SZBYR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 81 ALJR 1190; [2007] HCA 26
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate