Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Vo v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 108 Appeal from: Vo v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCCA 3609
File number: WAD 603 of 2018
Judges: DERRINGTON, BANKS-SMITH AND COLVIN JJ
Date of judgment: 25 June 2019
Catchwords: MIGRATION - appeal from decision of the Federal Circuit Court dismissing application for review of decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirming delegate's decision to refuse the appellant's application for a Regional Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class RN) visa - consideration of the proper interpretation of reg 1.05A of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) - whether the primary judge was in error in not finding jurisdictional error by the Tribunal - whether the Tribunal misconstrued the statutory provisions - whether the Tribunal failed to have regard to evidence of the appellant's dependence on her son - whether the Tribunal's adverse findings lacked an evident and intelligible justification - whether the Tribunal's decision was legally unreasonable - where the Tribunal failed to discharge the statutory task - appeal allowed
Legislation: Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) regs 1.05A, 1.10A, 1.12, 1.15A, Schedule 2 cl 187.311
Cases cited: Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 184; (2003) 236 FCR 593 CQG15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 146; (2016) 253 FCR 496 DAO16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 2; (2018) 258 FCR 175 ETA067 v The Republic of Nauru [2018] HCA 46 Fernandez v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCCA 1698 Fernandez v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1265; (2015) 238 FCR 251 Hembury v Chief of the General Staff [1998] HCA 47; (1998) 193 CLR 641 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34 IceTV Pty Limited v Nine Network Australia Pty Limited [2009] HCA 14; (2009) 239 CLR 458 Kalbasi v Western Australia [2018] HCA 7 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30; (2001) 206 CLR 323 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Singh [2014] FCAFC 1; (2014) 231 FCR 437 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton [2016] FCAFC 11; (2016) 237 FCR 1 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZSRS [2014] FCAFC 16 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW [2018] HCA 30 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu [1999] HCA 21; (1999) 197 CLR 611 Rural Press Limited v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2003] HCA 75; (2003) 216 CLR 53 Tran v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 297 Tsvetnenko v United States of America [2019] FCAFC 74 Viane v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 116
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate