Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Jorgensen v Fair Work Ombudsman [2019] FCAFC 113 Appeal from: Fair Work Ombudsman v Jorgensen (No. 2) [2018] FCCA 1202
File number: QUD 314 of 2018
Judges: GREENWOOD, REEVES AND WIGNEY JJ
Date of judgment: 8 July 2019
Catchwords: CONTEMPT OF COURT – appeal from orders made by primary judge on conviction and sentences of imprisonment – where appellant had been found guilty of contempt of freezing orders – where appellant third party to freezing orders – where appeal allowed in part – declarations set aside – matter remitted to the Federal Circuit Court of Australia for retrial
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 69, 136 Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 716(5) Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 (Cth) s 17 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 28(1)(f) Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth) r 19.02(1)
Cases cited: Admark Property Group Pty Ltd (in liq) v GJ Building and Contracting Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 1309 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v World Netsafe Pty Limited (No 3) [2003] FCA 159; 127 FCR 542 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Sigalla (No 3) [2010] NSWSC 1076 Cardile v LED Builders Pty Ltd [1999] HCA 18; 198 CLR 380 CCOM Pty Ltd v Jiejing Pty Limited [1992] FCA 325; 36 FCR 524 Clampett v Attorney-General (Cth) [2009] FCAFC 151; 181 FCR 473 Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd (1994) 49 FCR 576 Concrete Pty Ltd v Parramatta Design and Developments Pty Ltd [2006] HCA 55; 229 CLR 577 Denknis v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2018] FCA 1908 Fortune Holding Group Pty Ltd v Zhang (No 2) [2017] VSC 738 Galea v Galea (1990) 19 NSWLR 263 Goodwin v Commissioner of Police [2012] NSWCA 379 Huda & Huda & Latham [2018] FamCAFC 85 ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1992) 38 FCR 248 Jamal v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2019] NSWCA 121 Johnson v Johnson [2000] HCA 48; 201 CLR 488 Jones v National Coal Board [1957] 2 QB 55 Kazal v Thunder Studios Inc (California) [2017] FCAFC 111; 256 FCR 90 Kuru v New South Wales [2008] HCA 26; 236 CLR 1 Lockwood v Police (2010) 107 SASR 237 Metcash Trading Ltd v Bunn (No 5) [2009] FCA 16 Michael Wilson and Partners Limited v John Forster Emmott [2015] EWCA Civ 1028; [2015] All ER (D) 160 Michel v R [2009] UKPC 41; [2010] 1 WLR 879 OKS v Western Australia [2019] HCA 10; 93 ALJR 438 R v T, WA [2014] SASCFC 3; 118 SASR 382 Royal Guardian Mortgage Management Pty Ltd v Nguyen [2016] NSWCA 88; 332 ALR 128 RPS v The Queen [2000] HCA 3; 199 CLR 620 Seaward v Paterson [1897] 1 Ch 545 Sigalla v TZ Limited [2011] NSWCA 334 Sullivan v Trilogy Funds Management Ltd [2017] FCAFC 153; 255 FCR 503 SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] HCA 63; 228 CLR 152 Toth v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2017] NSWCA 344 Vakauta v Kelly [1989] HCA 44; 167 CLR 568 Weiss v The Queen [2005] HCA 81; 224 CLR 300 Wilde v R (1988) 164 CLR 365 Windoval Pty Limited v Donnelly [2014] FCAFC 127; 226 FCR 89 Yuill v Yuill [1945] 1 All ER 183 Zhu v Treasurer of the State of New South Wales [2004] HCA 56; 218 CLR 530
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate