Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Assistant Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Splendido [2019] FCAFC 132 Appeal from: Splendido v Assistant Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) [2018] FCA 1158
File number: VID 1060 of 2018
Judges: MORTIMER, MOSHINSKY AND WHEELAHAN JJ
Date of judgment: 16 August 2019
Catchwords: MIGRATION – mandatory cancellation of visa on character grounds under s 501(3A) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where representations made seeking revocation of the cancellation decision – where Assistant Minister decided not to revoke the cancellation decision – where Assistant Minister found that there existed a likelihood that the respondent would re-offend and, accordingly, that he represented an unacceptable risk of harm to the Australian community – where primary judge found that there was no evidence to support these findings – whether primary judge erred in so finding
Legislation: Constitution, s 75(v) Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth), s 44 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 189, 196, 474, 499, 501, 501CA Factories and Shops Act 1960 (Qld) Serious Sex Offenders Monitoring Act 2005 (Vic), s 11
Cases cited: Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33; 170 CLR 321 Australian Postal Corporation v D'Rozario [2014] FCAFC 89; 222 FCR 303 Australian Retailers Association v Reserve Bank of Australia [2005] FCA 1707; 148 FCR 446 BSJ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 78; 252 FCR 82 Christine George & Ors on behalf of the Gurambilbarra People v State of Queensland [2008] FCA 1518 Cotterill v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 61; 240 FCR 29 Hands v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 225; 364 ALR 423 Hannes v DPP (No 2) [2006] NSWCCA 373; 205 FLR 217 Hughes v The Queen [2017] HCA 20; 344 ALR 187 Malec v J C Hutton Pty Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 638 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40; 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v BHA17 [2018] FCAFC 68; 260 FCR 523 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Maioha [2018] FCAFC 216 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW [2018] HCA 30; 357 ALR 408 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18; 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16; 240 CLR 611 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SGLB [2004] HCA 32; 207 ALR 12 M v M (1988) 166 CLR 69 Muggeridge v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 200; 255 FCR 81 Nguyen v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 128 Ogbonna v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 620; 261 FCR 385 Picard v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1430 Rawson Finances Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2013] FCAFC 26; 296 ALR 307 RJE v Secretary to the Department of Justice [2008] VSCA 265; 21 VR 526 Sabourne v State of Western Australia [2010] WASCA 242 Sheen v Fields (1984) 51 ALR 345 SZNKV v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FCA 56; 118 ALD 232 Tanielu v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 673; 225 FCR 424 Tillmanns Butcheries Pty Ltd v Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union (1979) 27 ALR 367
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate