Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Calidad Pty Ltd v Seiko Epson Corporation (No 2) [2019] FCAFC 168 Appeal from: Seiko Epson Corporation v Calidad Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1403; 133 IPR 1
File number: NSD 348 of 2018
Judge: GREENWOOD, JAGOT AND YATES JJ
Date of judgment: 27 September 2019
Catchwords: PATENTS – appropriate form of orders to give effect to the Full Court's reasons for judgment on appeal – whether a declaration should be granted and the form of that declaration – whether injunctions should be granted and the form of those injunctions – whether it is appropriate to grant an injunction in general form
Legislation: Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), s 85(1) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 21 Patents Act 1990 (Cth), s 125
Cases cited: Adaptive Spectrum and Signal Alignment, Inc v British Telecommunications plc [2015] FSR 5 Apotex Pty Ltd v ICOS Corporation (No 4) [2018] FCA 1316 Christian v Société Des Produits Nestlé SA (No 2) [2015] FCAFC 153; 327 ALR 630 Coflexip S.A. v Stolt Comex Seaway MS Ltd [2001] RPC 9 Colbeam Palmer Ltd v Stock Affiliates Pty Ltd (1968) 122 CLR 25 Commonwealth Industrial Gases Ltd v MWA Holdings Pty Ltd (1920) 180 CLR 160 Fei Yu trading as Jewels 4 Pools v Beadcrete Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 117; 107 IPR 516 Hunter Pacific International Pty Ltd v Martec Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] FCA 1041 Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer plc (No 2) [2014] FSR 3 Interlego AG v Toltoys Pty Ltd (1973) 130 CLR 461 K-Aire Pty Ltd v Polyaire Pty Ltd [2003] SASC 41 K-Aire Pty Ltd v Polyaire Pty Ltd [2007] FCAFC 192; 74 IPR 460 Lifestyle Equities CV v Sportdirect.com Retail Limited [2018] EWHC 962 (Ch) Lockwood Security Products Pty Ltd v Doric Products Pty Ltd (No 2) [2007] HCA 21; 235 CLR 173 Microsoft Corporation v Marks (No 1) (1996) 69 FCR 117 Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co v Beiersdorf (Australia) Ltd (1980) 144 CLR 253 Mitolo Wines Aust Pty Ltd v Vito Mitolo & Son Pty Ltd (No 2) [2019] FCA 1140 QS Holdings Sarl v Paul's Retail Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 1038 Specsavers International Healthcare Ltd v Asda Stores Ltd (No 2) [2012] FSR 20 Solahart Industries Pty Ltd v Solar Shop Pty Limited (No 2) [2011] FCA 780; 92 IPR 197 Sun Microsystems Inc v Amtech Computer Corp Ltd [2006] FSR 35 Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd v Sharman Networks Ltd [2006] FCAFC 41; 150 FCR 110 Welch Perrin & Co Pty Ltd v Worrel (1961) 106 CLR 588 Welcome Real-Time SA v Catuity Inc (No 2) [2001] FCA 785
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate