Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Weti-Safwan v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 173 Appeal from: Weti-Safwan v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1761
File number: NSD 2156 of 2018
Judges: BESANKO, PERRY AND STEWART JJ
Date of judgment: 16 October 2019
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from an order made by the primary judge dismissing the appellant's application for judicial review of a decision made under s 501BA(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) to cancel the appellant's Class WR subclass 070 Bridging (Removal Pending) visa – new ground of appeal – whether the Minister misunderstood s 501BA(2) of the Act by proceeding on the basis that it precluded him from giving effect to the rules of natural justice by inviting the appellant to make submissions or provide further material – whether the Minister's misunderstanding was material so as to constitute jurisdictional error – consideration of Ibrahim v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 89 and Nguyen v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 128 – whether the Minister based conclusions with respect to the appellant's likelihood of reoffending, the level of risk she posed to the national interest and the level of tolerable risk to the community on probative material
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 501, 501BA, 501CA
Cases cited: Assistant Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Splendido [2019] FCAFC 132 Hands v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 225; (2018) 364 ALR 423 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34; (2018) 359 ALR 1 Ibrahim v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 89 Nguyen v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 128
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate