Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Chi Cong Le v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 178 Appeal from: Le v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2019] FCCA 445
File numbers: NSD 492 of 2019
Judges: NICHOLAS, KATZMANN AND BROMWICH JJ
Date of judgment: 18 October 2019
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from a decision of the Federal Circuit Court – where primary judge dismissed an application for judicial review of a decision of the second respondent, the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – where second respondent affirmed a decision of a delegate of the Minister to cancel the appellant's Class BS (Subclass 801) (Partner) visa – whether primary judge erred in finding that the appellant provided incorrect answers in visa application forms – whether primary judge erred in finding that there was no jurisdictional error by the second respondent considering documents to be subject to a valid s 375A certificate and thereby not providing those documents to the appellant pursuant to a request under s 362A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – held: appeal dismissed with costs
Legislation: Marriage Act 1961 (Cth) ss 23(1)(b), 23(2), 88E Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5F(1), 5F(2)(a), 12, 100, 101, 101(b) 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 362A, 375A, 375(1)(b), 376(1)(b), 438 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 2.41, sch 2, cl 300.211, cl 820.211(2),
Cases cited: Adelaide Motors Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1942) 66 CLR 436 AIU17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 520 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA [2019] HCA 3; 363 ALR 599 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; 194 CLR 355 Salama v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 2
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate