Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
FYBR v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 185 Appeal from: FYBR v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 500
File number: NSD 672 of 2019
Judges: FLICK, CHARLESWORTH AND STEWART JJ
Date of judgment: 24 October 2019
Catchwords: MIGRATION – Direction No 65 – the expectations of the Australian community – a primary consideration – correct interpretation of cl 11.3(1) – whether cl 11.3(1) a deeming provision – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 189, 499, 500, 501, 501CA
Cases cited: Afu v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1311 Bread Manufacturers of NSW v Evans [1981] HCA 69; 180 CLR 404 CPCF v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] HCA 1; 255 CLR 514 Djalic v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 151; 139 FCR 292 Drake v Minister for Immigration And Ethnic Affairs (1979) 24 ALR 577 DKXY v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 495 FYBR v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 500 Jack Woodridge on behalf of Gomilaroi People v Minister for Land and Water Conservation (NSW) [2002] FCA 1109; 122 FCR 190 Oluwafemi v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1389 Plaintiff M64/2015 v Minister For Immigration and Border Protection [2015] HCA 50; 258 CLR 173 R v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal; Ex parte 2HD Pty Ltd [1979] HCA 62; 144 CLR 45 Re FYBR and Minister for Home Affairs [2018] AATA 4281 Tanielu v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 673; 225 FCR 424 Uelese v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 348; 248 FCR 296 YNQY v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1466
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate