Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Phonographic Performance Company of Australia Limited v Copyright Tribunal of Australia (Costs) [2019] FCAFC 192 Appeal from: Phonographic Performance Company of Australia Limited under s 154(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) [2016] ACopyT 3 Phonographic Performance Company of Australia Limited under s 154(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (No 2) [2017] ACopyT 1 Phonographic Performance Company of Australia Limited under s 154(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (No 3) [2017] ACopyT 2
File number: NSD 945 of 2016
Judges: BESANKO, MIDDLETON AND BURLEY JJ
Date of judgment: 6 November 2019
Catchwords: COSTS – discretion as to costs – consideration and determination of percentages – lump sum costs orders made pursuant to r 40.02(b) of the Federal Court Rule 2011 (Cth) – if not agreed, amounts to be determined by a Registrar of the Court
Legislation: Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) s 154(4) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 40.02(b)
Cases cited: CHF16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) [2017] FCAFC 215; 257 FCR 161 GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Investments (Ireland) (No 2) Limited v Generic Partners Pty Limited (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 100 Phonographic Performance Company of Australia Limited v Copyright Tribunal of Australia [2019] FCAFC 95; 368 ALR 203
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate