Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mingos v Commissioner of Taxation [2019] FCAFC 211 Appeal from: Mingos v Commissioner of Taxation [2019] FCA 834
File number: VID 696 of 2019
Judges: KERR, DERRINGTON AND STEWARD JJ
Date of judgment: 15 November 2019
Date of publication of reasons: 29 November 2019
Catchwords: TAXATION – capital gain – main residence exemption – where title to property was transferred to a trustee company with the consent of the taxpayer pursuant to orders of the Federal Magistrates Court – where trust distributed proceeds from sale of the property to the taxpayer – where taxpayer did not include capital gain from sale of the property in his assessable income for the 2014 income year – where taxpayer sought to rely on exemption in s 118-110 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) – where taxpayer contended he had an ownership interest in the property – whether taxpayer had a full equitable interest in the property by reason of the orders made by the Federal Magistrates Court – whether taxpayer held an equitable interest in the nature of an equity of redemption – whether transfer of the property to the trustee company gave rise to a resulting or constructive trust in favour of the taxpayer – where primary judge made findings based on the reliability and credibility of the witnesses – whether taxpayer demonstrated that the findings were wrong by "incontrovertible facts or uncontested testimony" or were "glaringly improbable" or "contrary to compelling inferences" – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 79 Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) ss 106-50, 118-110, 118-125, 118-130 Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) Sch 1, ss 284-75, 298-20
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate