Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Red Cross Society v Queensland Nurses' Union of Employees [2019] FCAFC 215 Appeal from: Queensland Nurses' Union of Employees v Australian Red Cross Society & Ors [2018] FCCA 3471 Queensland Nurses Union of Employees v Australian Red Cross Society & Ors [2019] FCCA 706
File number: QUD 934 of 2018
Judges: GREENWOOD, BESANKO AND RANGIAH JJ
Date of judgment: 3 December 2019
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW — appeal from orders made by a judge of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia — where an employee of the first appellant engaged in protected industrial action — where the primary judge found that the first appellant took adverse action in contravention of s 340(1)(a) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) and that the second and third appellants were involved in those contraventions — where primary judge made orders with respect to compensation and pecuniary penalties INDUSTRIAL LAW — where primary judge found that each appellant had knowledge that the employee had engaged in protected industrial action — whether knowledge is a pre-condition to the engagement of the presumption in s 361 of the Act — consideration of the elements to be established in order to engage s 361 of the Act — whether the primary judge considered all of the evidence relevant to knowledge — whether this Court can assess and weigh the relevant evidence — whether it is appropriate in the circumstances to order a retrial
Legislation: Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904 (Cth) s 5 Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 340, 360, 361, 550, 793
Cases cited: Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Hall [2018] FCAFC 83; (2018) 261 FCR 347 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Hall [2017] FCA 274; (2017) 269 IR 28 Board of Bendigo Regional Institute of Technical and Further Education v Barclay (No 1) [2012] HCA 32; (2012) 248 CLR 500 Celand v Skycity Adelaide Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 222; (2017) 256 FCR 306 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 50 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 25; (2015) 230 FCR 298 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Clermont Coal Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 1014; (2015) 253 IR 166 Elliott v Kodak Australasia Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1804; (2001) 129 IR 251 Expectation Pty Ltd v PRD Realty Pty Ltd [2004] FCAFC 189; (2004) 140 FCR 17 General Motors-Holden's Pty Ltd v Bowling (1976) 51 ALJR 235 Port Kembla Coal Terminal Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2016] FCAFC 99; (2016) 248 FCR 18 Tattsbet Ltd v Morrow [2015] FCAFC 62; (2015) 233 FCR 46
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate