Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Dang v Administrative Appeals Tribunal [2019] FCAFC 220 Appeal from: Dang v Administrative Appeals Tribunal [2019] FCCA 586
File number: WAD 145 of 2019
Judges: KERR, COLVIN AND JACKSON JJ
Date of judgment: 11 December 2019
Catchwords: MIGRATION - appeal from decision of the Federal Circuit Court dismissing application for judicial review of decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirming decision of a delegate of the Minister to refuse to grant the appellant a visa - where visa required satisfaction of the health criteria in cl 4007 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) - where delegate's refusal of the visa based on the appellant's son's failure to meet the health criteria by reason of his medical condition - where opinion prepared by Medical Officer as required by the Regulations - whether assessment undertaken by the Medical Officer sufficiently identified the nature and extent of the appellant's son's medical condition - whether opinion of Medical Officer was based on sufficiently current information - whether the Tribunal did not afford the appellant procedural fairness in failing to disclose a certificate issued under s 375A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) - where information covered by the certificate was used to determine the costs to the Australian community of medical and community services for the appellant's son - consideration of the primary judge's approach to materiality - appeal allowed
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 33(1)(c), 33(1AA) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 375A Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 2.25A, Schedule 4 cl 4007
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate