Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
DLJ18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 236 Appeal from: DLJ18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1650
File number: NSD 2395 of 2018
Judges: FLICK, BROMBERG AND SNADEN JJ
Date of judgment: 19 December 2019
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for judicial review of a ministerial decision under s 501CA(4) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) not to revoke the cancellation of a visa – appeal from a single judge of the Federal Court of Australia – whether permanent removal from Australia was a legal consequence of the minister's decision – whether the minister was obliged to or did take account of that consequence – whether the primary judge erred by not accepting that the minister's decision was the product of jurisdictional error – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 48A, 476A, 501, 501CA, 501E Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) Sch 5, cl 5001(c)
Cases cited: Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 236 FCR 593 Bat Advocacy NSW Inc v Minister for Environment Protection, Heritage and the Arts (2011) 180 LGERA 99 CAR15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 155 Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2017) 252 FCR 352 Cotterill v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2016) 240 FCR 29 DLJ18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1650 DYY18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1901 Ezegbe v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 216 Faulkner v Conwell (1989) 21 FCR 41 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34, (2018) 264 CLR 123 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Home Affairs v Buadromo (2018) 362 ALR 48 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v BHA17 (2018) 260 FCR 523 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Sabharwal [2018] FCAFC 160 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA [2019] HCA 3, (2019) 264 CLR 421 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 Navoto v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 135 NBMZ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCAFC 38, (2014) 220 FCR 1 Re Patterson; Ex Parte Taylor (2001) 207 CLR 391 Soliman v University of Technology, Sydney [2012] FCAFC 146, (2012) 207 FCR 277 Splendido v Assistant Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) [2018] FCA 1158 Tanielu v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 1221, (2014) 226 FCR 154 Taulahi v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2016) 246 FCR 146 Tickner v Chapman (1995) 57 FCR 451 Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak [2013] HCA 43, (2015) 252 CLR 480
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate