Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Jadwan Pty Ltd v Rae & Partners (A Firm) (No 2) [2020] FCAFC 95 File number: TAD 28 of 2018
Judges: BROMWICH, O'CALLAGHAN AND WHEELAHAN JJ
Date of judgment: 29 May 2020
Catchwords: COSTS – whether to reduce the costs payable by the appellant to the respondents on account of the appellant's partial success in the appeal – no reduction applied – whether to make a lump sum costs order – direction for Registrar of the Court to assess the lump sum of costs to be awarded and make orders.
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 35A(1)(h), 43 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 3.01(b), 40.02, item 221 of Schedule 2
Cases cited: Ah Toy v Registrar of Companies [1985] FCA 291; 10 FCR 280 Driclad Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1968] HCA 91; 121 CLR 45 Idenix Pharmaceuticals LLC v Gilead Sciences Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 7 Jadwan Pty Ltd v Rae & Partners (A Firm) [2020] FCAFC 62 Martin v Norton Rose Fulbright Australia (No 2) [2020] FCAFC 42 Neptune Hospitality Pty Ltd v Ozmen Entertainment Pty Ltd (costs) [2020] FCAFC 74 Northern Territory v Sangare [2019] HCA 25; 265 CLR 164 Paciocco v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group (No 2) [2017] FCAFC 146; 253 FCR 403
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate