Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Viane v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 144 Appeal from: Viane v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 152
File number: NSD 301 of 2020
Judgment of: BESANKO, KERR AND CHARLESWORTH JJ
Date of judgment: 24 August 2020
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from judgment dismissing an application for judicial review of a migration decision made under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – Minister refusing to revoke a decision to cancel the appellant's visa on character grounds – whether Minister committed jurisdictional error in the exercise of the power conferred by s 501CA(4) of the Act – where Minister made findings of fact concerning the impediments the appellant would face if removed from Australia and relocated to American Samoa or Samoa – whether the Minister made findings concerning social and cultural circumstances in American Samoa or Samoa without objective evidentiary foundation – whether the findings were based on the Minister's personal or specialised knowledge – whether the asserted errors were material and so properly characterised as jurisdictional – whether decision affected by legal unreasonableness – whether Minister failed to genuinely consider the appellant's submissions concerning the expectations of the Australian community – whether the Minister failed to afford procedural fairness
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 144 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 474, 501, 501(3A), 501CA
Cases cited: Anaki v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 77 DVE18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 83 Hands v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 267 FCR 628 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 264 CLR 123 Marzano v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2017) 250 FCR 548 McLachlan v Assistant Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 109 Minster for Home Affairs v Omar [2019] FCAFC 188; 373 ALR 569 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Maioha (2018) 267 FCR 643 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton (2016) 237 FCR 1 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA (2019) 264 CLR 421 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW (2018) 264 CLR 541 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v WZARH (2015) 256 CLR 326 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS (2010) 240 CLR 611 Muggeridge v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2017) 255 FCR 81 Navoto v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 135 Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476 Romeo v Asher (1991) 29 FCR 343 Schmidt v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 162 ALD 495 SFGB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 77 ALD 402 Soliman v University of Technology, Sydney (2012) 207 FCR 277 Uelese v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 256 CLR 203 Uelese v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2016) 248 FCR 296 Viane v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 152 Viane v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 263 FCR 531 Vo v Minister for Home Affairs (2019) 269 FCR 566 Webb v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 831
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate