Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
MBJY v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 11 Appeal from: MBJY v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1161
File number: WAD 211 of 2020
Judgment of: ALLSOP CJ, O'CALLAGHAN AND COLVIN JJ
Date of judgment: 15 February 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION - appeal from decision dismissing application for judicial review of decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal - where Tribunal affirmed decision of delegate of Minister not to revoke mandatory cancellation of visa - where appellant convicted of three counts of sexual offending against step-child and acquitted of fourth count of sexual offending against other step-child - where Tribunal received material relating to fourth count - whether primary judge erred in concluding Tribunal could take contentious material into account - whether primary judge erred in finding Tribunal's decision not vitiated by jurisdictional error due to apprehended bias - whether contentious material irrelevant - whether Tribunal had no jurisdiction to dispute findings by sentencing judge - appeal dismissed
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 7, 10B, 14, 63 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 501, 501CA
Cases cited: CNY17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 159; (2018) 264 FCR 87 CNY17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] HCA 50 Ebner v The Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; (2000) 205 CLR 337 FSG17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 29; (2020) 274 FCR 456 Han v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 331 Hot Holdings Pty Ltd v Creasy [2002] HCA 51; (2002) 210 CLR 438 HZCP v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 202; (2019) 273 FCR 121 Isbester v Knox City Council [2015] HCA 20; (2015) 255 CLR 135 Iyer v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1788 Minister for Home Affairs v Brown [2020] FCAFC 21; (2020) 275 FCR 188 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Makasa [2021] HCA 1 Michael Wilson & Partners Limited v Nicholls [2011] HCA 48; (2011) 244 CLR 427 Murad v Assistant Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 73; (2017) 250 FCR 510 Re JRL; Ex parte CJL (1986) 161 CLR 342 SZQYM v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 779 SZRUI v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship [2013] FCAFC 80 Webb v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 41
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate