Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
ESQ18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 44 Appeal from: ESQ18 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2020] FCCA 472
File number: WAD 78 of 2020
Judgment of: REEVES, BANKS-SMITH AND ANASTASSIOU JJ
Date of judgment: 26 March 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal of a decision of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – where the Federal Circuit Court dismissed an application for judicial review of a decision of the Immigration Assessment Authority (the Authority) to affirm a decision of a delegate of the Minister to refuse the appellant's application for a protection visa – where the Authority did not exercise discretion under s 473DC of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether the primary judge erred in failing to find the Authority was legally unreasonable in failing to exercise discretion – where the Authority refused to consider an "unarticulated claim" raised by the delegate – whether the unarticulated claim clearly emerges from the materials before the Authority – whether primary judge erred in finding that unarticulated claim had been withdrawn or abandoned – appeal allowed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Migration Amendment (Protection and Other Measures) Act 2015 (Cth)
Cases cited: APE16 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 93 AYY17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 261 FCR 503; [2018] FCAFC 89 BYR17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1324 Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2017) 252 FCR 352; [2017] FCAFC 107 CSO15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 260 FCR 134; [2018] FCAFC 14 DOU16 v Minister for Home Affairs (2019) 272 FCR 358; [2019] FCAFC 212 ESQ18 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2020] FCCA 472 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v BBS16 [2017] FCAFC 176 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v CRY16 (2017) 253 FCR 475; [2017] FCAFC 210 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v DZU16 (2018) 253 FCR 526; [2018] FCAFC 32 MZYQZ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 948 NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) (2004) 144 FCR 1; [2004] FCAFC 263 Plaintiff M174/2016 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 264 CLR 217; [2018] HCA 16 SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2006) 228 CLR 152; [2006] HCA 63
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate