Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2021] FCAFC 49 Appeal from: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft [2019] FCA 2166
File number: NSD 125 of 2020
Judgment of: WIGNEY, BEACH, AND O'BRYAN JJ
Date of judgment: 9 April 2021
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – admitted contraventions of s 29(1)(a) of the Australian Consumer Law by appellant Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft – where regulatory proceedings settled as between the regulator, Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, and Volkswagen and its subsidiaries and affiliates – where the parties jointly proposed an agreed pecuniary penalty as part of the settlement – where the primary judge found that the agreed pecuniary penalty was not appropriate within the meaning of s 224(1) of the Australian Consumer Law – where the primary judge held that the agreed pecuniary penalty was manifestly inadequate – where the primary judge imposed a higher civil pecuniary penalty APPEAL – appeal from a judgment imposing a higher penalty than the agreed pecuniary penalty between the parties – whether the primary judge erred in determining that the agreed pecuniary penalty was not appropriate – whether the imposed higher penalty was manifestly excessive – relevant principles regarding the determination of an appropriate civil pecuniary penalty – whether the primary judge considered all relevant matters in determining the civil pecuniary penalty pursuant to s 224(1) of the Australian Consumer Law – where the parties did not demonstrate appellable error by the primary judge – where appellate intervention was not warranted – appeal dismissed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate