Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Nobarani v Mariconte [2021] FCAFC 96 Appeal from: Mariconte v Nobarani [2020] FCA 1485
File number: NSD 1227 of 2020
Judgment of: ALLSOP CJ, FARRELL AND DERRINGTON JJ
Date of judgment: 7 June 2021
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY – appeal against order setting aside bankruptcy notice – whether bankruptcy notice was issued for an improper purpose – whether bankruptcy notice was an abuse of process – appeal allowed
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)
Cases cited: Alhalek v Quintiliani trading as Kells Lawyers [2020] FCA 1272 Cavoli v Etl [2007] FCA 1191 Killoran v Duncan, in the matter of Killoran [1999] FCA 1574 King v Collins [2007] NSWCA 122 Maxwell-Smith v S & E Hall Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 825 Nobarani v Mariconte [2018] HCA 36; 265 CLR 236 Nobarani v Mariconte (No 2) [2018] HCA 49; 360 ALR 390 Prentice v Fewin Pty Ltd, in the matter of Prentice [2017] FCA 490 Re Estate of McLaren; Mariconte v Nobarani [2015] NSWSC 667 Re Iris McLaren (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 1894 Reaper v Baycorp Collections PDL (Australia) Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 13 Royal v Nazloomian, in the matter of Royal [2019] FCA 555 Sandell v Porter [1966] HCA 28; 115 CLR 666 Schellenberg v Tunnel Holdings Pty Ltd [2000] HCA 18; 200 CLR 121 Slack v Bottoms English Solicitors [2002] FCA 1445 Switz Pty Ltd v Glowbind Pty Ltd [2000] NSWSC 222 Williams v Spautz [1992] HCA 34; 174 CLR 509 Young v Cooke [2017] FCA 26
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate