Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Vargas v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCAFC 162 Appeal from: Vargas v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCA 276
File number(s): QUD 122 of 2021
Judgment of: MCKERRACHER, MARKOVIC AND SC DERRINGTON JJ
Date of judgment: 3 September 2021
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from decision of primary judge dismissing application made under s 476A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act) for judicial review of a migration decision – where Minister used his discretion under s 501BA of the Act to set aside a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) made under s 501CA of the Act – whether the Minister's refusal to afford the appellant natural justice in the process of, or leading up to, the exercise of his power in s 501BA(2) was unreasonable – whether Federal Court has jurisdiction to review the process leading up to exercise of such power – whether the Minister's disagreement with a comment by the AAT that the appellant is not a 'threat to all women' is a finding that is 'illogical, irrational or unreasonable' – whether the Minister failed to apply any 'active intellectual process' to certain matters affecting his decision – whether Minister failed to take into account materials before the AAT that were mandatory relevant considerations
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5, 189, 474, 476A, 501, 501BA, 501CA Migration Amendment (Character and General Visa Cancellation) Act 2014 (Cth)
Cases cited: Chamoun v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 66; (2020) 276 FCR 75 DAO16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 2; (2018) 258 FCR 175 DOB18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 63; (2019) FCR 636 Graham v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] HCA 33; (2017) 347 ALR 350 Hands v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 225; (2018) 267 FCR 628 Ibrahim v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 89; (2019) 270 FCR 12 McHugh v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 223; (2020) 385 ALR 485 Minister for Home Affairs v Brown [2020] FCAFC 21; (2020) 275 FCR 188 Minister for Home Affairs v Omar [2019] FCAFC 188; (2019) 272 FCR 589 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZSSJ [2016] HCA 29; (2016) 259 CLR 180 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16; (2010) 240 CLR 611 Plaintiff M64/2015 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] HCA 50; (2015) 258 CLR 173 Tang v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2013] FCAFC 139; (2013) 217 FCR 55
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate