Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Caffitaly System S.P.A. v One Collective Group Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCAFC 164 File number: NSD 755 of 2020
Judgment of: YATES, MOSHINSKY AND BURLEY JJ
Date of judgment: 15 September 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – costs – appeal – where appellant unsuccessful in its infringement case and in its validity case regarding two out of three patents – where appellant successful in relation to the validity of one patent
Cases cited: BlueScope Steel Limited v Dongkuk Steel Mill Co Ltd (No 3) [2020] FCA 113 Federal Treasury Enterprise (FKP) Sojuzplodoimport v Spirits International B.V. (No 2) [2021] FCAFC 120 Fuchs Lubricants (Australasia) Pty Ltd v Quaker Chemical (Australasia) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCAFC 114 Les Laboratoires Servier v Apotex Pty Ltd (2016) 247 FCR 61 Sandvik Intellectual Property AB v Quarry Mining & Construction Equipment Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCAFC 158
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Patents and associated Statutes
Number of paragraphs: 12
Date of last submissions: 14 July 2021
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Counsel for the Appellant: AR Lang S.C.
Solicitor for the Appellant: Bird & Bird
Counsel for the Respondents: C Dimitriadis S.C. with JS Cooke and AE McDonald
Solicitor for the Respondents: Barry Nilsson Lawyers
ORDERS NSD 755 of 2020
BETWEEN: CAFFITALY SYSTEM S.P.A. Appellant
AND: ONE COLLECTIVE GROUP PTY LTD (ACN 604 582 854) First Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate