Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Allergan Australia Pty Ltd v Self Care IP Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCAFC 180 File number(s): NSD 35 of 2021 NSD 249 of 2021
Judgment of: JAGOT, LEE AND THAWLEY JJ
Date of judgment: 13 October 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – parties ordered to confer with a view to agreeing orders giving effect to the Full Court's reasons for judgment or provide competing orders and submissions – parties were not able to agree and provided competing orders and submissions – application to make further submissions in relation to appropriate orders made consequent upon respondents' change of solicitors – application to make further submissions refused – final orders made
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Sch 2 (Australian Consumer Law) ss 18, 29(1)(a), 29(1)(g), 232 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Pt VB, s 37M Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) ss 120(1), 120(2), 126(1)(a)
Cases cited: Allergan Australia Pty Ltd v Self Care IP Holdings Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1530 Allergan Australia Pty Ltd v Self Care IP Holdings Pty Ltd [2021] FCAFC 163 Burrell v The Queen [2008] HCA 34; (2008) 238 CLR 218 Calidad Pty Ltd v Seiko Epson Corporation (No 2) [2019] FCAFC 168; 147 IPR 386 Christian v Société Des Produits Nestlé SA (No 2) [2015] FCAFC 153; 327 ALR 630
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Trade Marks
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate