Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Djokovic v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 3 File number: VID 18 of 2022
Judgment of: ALLSOP CJ, BESANKO AND O'CALLAGHAN JJ
Date of judgment: 16 January 2022
Date of publication of reasons: 20 January 2022
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for review of decision of the Minister to cancel visa under personal power under s 133C(3) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where Minister satisfied that a ground for cancelling the visa under s 116 of the Migration Act existed – where Minister satisfied that the presence of the applicant in Australia may be a risk to the health, safety or good order of the Australian community under s 116(1)(e)(i) of the Migration Act – where Minister satisfied under s 133C(3)(b) of the Migration Act that it would be in the public interest to cancel the visa – application dismissed
Legislation: Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021 (Cth) ss 153, 153(1) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 20(1A), 32AD, 32AD(3) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 116, 116(1)(e)(i), 133C, 133C(3), 133C(3)(a), 133C(3)(b), 133C(4), 476, 476A Migration Amendment (Character and General Visa Cancellation) Act 2014 (Cth)
Cases cited: Acting Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v CWY20 [2021] FCAFC 195; 395 ALR 57 Avon Downs Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1949] HCA 26; 78 CLR 353 Boucaut Bay Company Ltd (in Liq) v Commonwealth [1927] HCA 59; 40 CLR 98 Buck v Bavone [1976] HCA 24; 135 CLR 110 Council of the Municipality of Bankstown v Fripp [1919] HCA 41; 26 CLR 385 CQG15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 146; 253 FCR 496 Djokovic v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FedCFamC2G 7 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Brian Hatch Timber Co. (Sales) Pty Ltd [1972] HCA 73; 128 CLR 28 Leota v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1120 Lewis v Australian Capital Territory [2020] HCA 26; 381 ALR 375 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Limited [1986] HCA 40; 162 CLR 24 Minister for Home Affairs v DUA16 [2020] HCA 46; 385 ALR 212 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Eden [2016] FCAFC 28; 240 FCR 158 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Singh [2014] FCAFC 1; 231 FCR 437 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton [2016] FCAFC 11; 237 FCR 1 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW [2018] HCA 30; 264 CLR 541 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18; 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16; 240 CLR 611 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu [1999] HCA 21; 197 CLR 611 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SGLB [2004] HCA 32; 207 ALR 12 Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v ERY19 [2021] FCAFC 133 Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v Viane [2021] HCA 41; 395 ALR 403 MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2021] HCA 17; 390 ALR 590 Newall v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1624 R v Connell; Ex Parte Hetton Bellbird Collieries Ltd (No 2) [1944] HCA 42; 69 CLR 407 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex Parte Applicant S20/2002 [2003] HCA 30; 198 ALR 59 Plaintiff S156/2013 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] HCA 22; 254 CLR 28 Plaintiff S297/2013 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] HCA 3; 255 CLR 231 Tien v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1998] FCA 1552; 89 FCR 80 Wei v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] HCA 51; 257 CLR 22 Aronson M, Groves M and Weeks G, Judicial Review of Administrative Action and Government Liability (7th ed, Thomson Reuters, 2021)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate