Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Commissioner of Taxation v Bosanac (No 2) [2022] FCAFC 5 Appeal from: Commissioner of Taxation v Bosanac (No 7) [2021] FCA 249
File number(s): WAD 82 of 2021
Judgment of: KENNY, DAVIES AND THAWLEY JJ
Date of judgment: 31 January 2022
Catchwords: COSTS – where appeal allowed – whether Court should depart from usual order that costs follow the event
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 43 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 40.03
Cases cited: Australian Postal Corporation v Botany Municipal Council [1989] FCA 747; 69 LGRA 86 Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd (No 3) [2007] FCAFC 119 Commissioner of Taxation v AusNet Transmission Group Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCAFC 124 Commissioner of Taxation v Bosanac [2021] FCAFC 158 Conder v Silkbard Pty Ltd [1999] NSWCA 459 Firebird Global Master Fund II Ltd v Republic of Nauru (No 2) [2015] HCA 53; 90 ALJR 270; 327 ALR 192 Hughes v Western Australian Cricket Association (Inc) [1986] FCA 511; (1986) ATPR 40-748 Malick v Lloyd [1913] HCA 37; 16 CLR 483 National Australia Bank Ltd v KDS Construction Services Pty Ltd [1987] HCA 65; 163 CLR 668 Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) [2001] FCA 1865; 115 FCR 229
Division: General Division
Registry: Western Australia
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate