Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v DOM19 [2022] FCAFC 21 Appeal from: DOM19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 862
File number(s): WAD 196 of 2021
Judgment of: MORTIMER, Halley and o'Sullivan JJ
Date of judgment: 28 February 2022
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal – Administrative Appeals Tribunal did not allow oral evidence from witness where applicant had not provided Minister with a written statement outlining evidence of that witness – proper construction of s 500(6H) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether the written statement under s 500(6H) must notify the Minister of the witness's identity – appeal allowed
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth), s 2B Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 500(6H), 500(6J)
Cases cited: DCR19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 229 DOM19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 862 Goldie v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1318; 111 FCR 378 Mordechai v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 986; 196 FCR 509 SZRTN v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 303; 141 ALD 395 SZRTN v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCAFC 129 Uelese v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] HCA 15; 256 CLR 203
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate