Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Nusipepa v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 24 Appeal from: Nusipepa v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCCA 1088
File number: NSD 600 of 2020
Judgment of: FARRELL, BURLEY AND LEE JJ
Date of judgment: 2 March 2022
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from Federal Circuit Court decision to dismiss an application for review of delegate's decision to cancel visa on basis that appellant posed a risk to individuals in the Australian community – application for leave to rely on amended notice of appeal – consideration of relevant principles – whether proposed grounds meritorious – whether primary judge erred in finding that the certificates issued by the Minister pursuant to s 376 of the Migration Act 1959 (Cth) (Act) were valid – whether any error by the primary judge with respect to s 376 of the Act was material – whether primary judge erred in finding that Tribunal did not fail to invite appellant to address matters pursuant to s 360 of the Act – whether primary judge should have found that the Tribunal was affected by apprehended bias – leave to rely on amended notice of appeal refused – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 130 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 116, 360, 376, 438
Cases cited: Corrs Pavey Whiting & Byrne v Collector of Customs (Vic) (1987) 14 FCR 434 Crown Resorts Ltd v Zantran Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 1; (2020) 276 FCR 477 CYA18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1616 Gartside v Outram (1856) 26 LJ Ch 113 Iyer v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 929; (2001) 64 ALD 9 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA [2019] HCA 3; (2019) 264 CLR 421 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZKTI [2009] HCA 30; (2009) 238 CLR 489 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng [2001] HCA 17; (2001) 205 CLR 507 Nusipepa v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCCA 1088 Park v Brothers [2005] HCA 73; (2005) 222 ALR 421 Richards v Kadian [2005] NSWCA 328; (2005) 64 NSWLR 204 Sun v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 52; (2016) 243 FCR 220 SZKMS v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 499 VUAX v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 158; (2004) 238 FCR 588
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate