Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Khalil v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 26 Appeal from: Khalil v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1134
File number(s): WAD 229 of 2021
Judgment of: KATZMANN, BANKS-SMITH AND ROFE JJ
Date of judgment: 3 March 2022
Catchwords: MIGRATION — appeal from a decision of a single judge — where the primary judge dismissed an application for judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirming a decision of the Minister to refuse to grant the appellant a visa under s 501(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) — whether primary judge erred in finding no error in the Tribunal's rejection of expert evidence concerning the appellant's prospects of reoffending — whether the Tribunal erred in failing to consider the evidence of the expert concerning the effect on the appellant's young children of refusing to grant the visa — whether Tribunal failed to consider evidence concerning children's and their mother's susceptibility to Huntington's disease — whether, if so, the failure was material to the decision PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — application for leave to raise new ground of appeal not before primary judge — where appellant's sole basis for raising new grounds was a change of counsel, whether explanation sufficient to justify grant of leave — whether proposed new ground has sufficient merit
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 25, 33(1), 43 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 474, 499, 500, 501
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate