Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
RRFM v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 27 Appeal from: RRFM v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1273
File number: VID 628 of 2021
Judgment of: NICHOLAS, YATES AND BURLEY JJ
Date of judgment: 4 March 2022
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal against order dismissing application for judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal not to revoke a decision to cancel appellant's visa – where appellant made representation concerning the prospect that he would experience indefinite detention – whether Tribunal failed to consider representation made by the appellant – whether Tribunal engaged in active intellectual process in considering representation
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 501(3A)
Cases cited: AJL20 v Commonwealth of Australia (2020) 279 FCR 549 Ali v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 650 BFMV v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 199 Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2017) 252 FCR 352 CAR15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2019) 272 FCR 131 Commonwealth of Australia v AJL20 (2021) 391 ALR 562 DOB18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1523 Lafu v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCAFC 140 Minister for Home Affairs v Omar (2019) 272 FCR 589 Navoto v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 135 Tickner v Chapman (1995) 57 FCR 451 WKMZ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 55
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate