Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Krok v Shangri-La Construction Pty Ltd [2022] FCAFC 32 Appeal from: Shangri-La Construction Pty Ltd v Hyatt, in the matter of GVE Hampton Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (No 2) [2021] FCA 1048
File number(s): VID 532 of 2021
Judgment of: MARKOVIC, DERRINGTON AND GOODMAN JJ
Date of judgment: 11 March 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal – where primary judge dismissed an application to stay examinations as an abuse of process – application for leave dismissed
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
Cases cited: Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc [1991] FCA 844; (1991) 33 FCR 397 Shangri-La Construction Pty Ltd v Hyatt, in the matter of GVE Hampton Pty Ltd (in liquidation) [2020] FCA 1577 Walton v ACN 004 410 833 Limited (formerly Arrium Limited) (in liquidation) [2022] HCA 3
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 30
Date of hearing: 7 February 2022
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr M Black
Solicitor for the Applicants: Aitken Partners
Counsel for the Respondent: Dr M Wolff
Solicitor for the Respondent: Noble Lawyers
ORDERS VID 532 of 2021
BETWEEN: EUGENE KROK First Applicant
VLADISLAV HYATT Second Applicant
GREG KROK (and another named in the Schedule) Third Applicant
AND: SHANGRI-LA CONSTRUCTION PTY LTD Respondent
order made by: MARKOVIC, DERRINGTON AND GOODMAN JJ DATE OF ORDER: 11 MARCH 2022
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate