Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Chen v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 41 Appeal from: Chen v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCCA 1666
File number: QUD 262 of 2021
Judgment of: BROMBERG, MURPHY, MARKOVIC JJ
Date of judgment: 17 March 2022
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from decision of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – where appellant disclosed a criminal conviction in a visa application but had failed to do so in an earlier visa application – whether apprehended bias on the part of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal established – applicable test for apprehended bias – applicable standard of appellate review – apprehended bias made out – appeal allowed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 360 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) cll 485.216; 4040
Cases cited: ALA15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 30 Applicant VEAL of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] HCA 72; 225 CLR 88 British American Tobacco Australia Services Limited v Laurie [2011] HCA 2; 242 CLR 283 CNY17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] HCA 50; 268 CLR 76 Coal and Allied Operations Pty Ltd v Australian Industrial Relations Commission [2000] HCA 47; 203 CLR 194 Concrete Pty Limited v Parramatta Design and Developments Pty Ltd [2006] HCA 55; 229 CLR 577 Ebner v The Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; 205 CLR 337 Fox v Percy [2003] HCA 22; 214 CLR 118 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Jadwan Pty Ltd v Rae & Partners (A Firm) [2020] FCAFC 62; 278 FCR 1 Livesey v New South Wales Bar Association [1983] HCA 17; 151 CLR 288 Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd v Nicholls [2011] HCA 48; 244 CLR 427 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW [2018] HCA 30; 264 CLR 541 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng [2001] HCA 17; 205 CLR 507 NADH of 2001 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 328; 214 ALR 264 Norbis v Norbis [1986] HCA 17; 161 CLR 513 Patel v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 22; 145 ALD 566 R v Watson; Ex parte Armstrong [1976] HCA 39; 136 CLR 248 R v Sussex Justices; Ex parte McCarthy [1924] 1 KB 256 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Epeabaka [2001] HCA 23; 206 CLR 128 Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala [2000] HCA 57; 204 CLR 82 Refugee Review Tribunal, Re: Ex parte H [2001] HCA 28; 179 ALR 425 Sarbjit Singh v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1996] FCA 902 Sun v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 52; 243 FCR 220 SZRUI v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship [2013] FCAFC 80 Trivedi v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCAFC 42; 220 FCR 169 VFAB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 872; 131 FCR 102 Warren v Coombes [1979] HCA 9; 142 CLR 531
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate