Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Wills v Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Skills Quality Authority (Costs) [2022] FCAFC 43 File number(s): QUD 401 of 2020
Judgment of: LOGAN, GRIFFITHS AND PERRY JJ
Date of judgment: 22 March 2022
Catchwords: COSTS – whether costs should be paid on an indemnity rather than a party/party basis – where Chief Executive of the Australian Skills Quality Authority (ASQA) made an offer of compromise – where ASQA seeks costs of and incidental to appeal on an indemnity basis under r 25.14(2) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), or alternatively costs paid on an indemnity basis consistent with the principles in Calderbank v Calderbank – where ultimate question is whether the failure to accept an offer in all the circumstances warrants departure from the ordinary rules as to costs – whether an offer of compromise on the basis simply that there be no order as to costs is a genuine compromise for the purposes of rule 25.01(1) or the Calderbank principle – where applicant's rejection of the offer of compromise was not unreasonable in the circumstances – application for indemnity costs dismissed
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 National Vocational Education and Training Regulator Act 2011 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) (repealed) O 23 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 25.01, 25.14(2)
Cases cited: Anchorage Capital Partners Pty Ltd v ACPA Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 112 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Black on White [2002] FCA 1605 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2002] FCA 192; (2002) 201 ALR 618 Brymount Pty Ltd t/as Watson Toyota v Cummins (No 2) [2005] NSWCA 69 Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 All ER 333 Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225 Fyna Foods Australia Pty Ltd v Cobannah Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2004] FCA 1212 Hazeldene's Chicken Farm Pty Ltd v Victorian WorkCover Authority (No 2) [2005] VSCA 298; (2005) 13 VR 435 NMFM Property Pty Ltd v Citibank Ltd (No 2) (Court's "NMFM" Judgment No 11) [2001] FCA 480; (2001) 109 FCR 77 Nutrientwater Pty Ltd v Baco Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCA 304 University of Western Australia v Gray (No 21) [2008] FCA 1056; (2008) 249 ALR 360 Vasram v AMP Life Ltd [2002] FCA 1286 Wills v Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Skills Quality Authority [2022] FCAFC 10
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate