Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Garner v Central Innovation Pty Limited [2022] FCAFC 64 Appeal from: Central Innovation Pty Ltd v Garner (No 4) [2020] FCA 1796
File number: NSD 69 of 2021
Judgment of: CHARLESWORTH, STEWART AND HALLEY JJ
Date of judgment: 21 April 2022
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – appeal from decision of primary judge that judgment and verdict be entered in favour of respondents in respect of 36 customers lost due to actions of appellant – whether primary judge wrongly departed from the case pleaded by the appellant – whether primary judge erred in finding that respondents established loss or damage – whether primary judge made erroneous findings as to the taking or removal of confidential information by the appellant – whether primary judge made erroneous findings as to the credibility of the evidence given by the appellant – whether primary judge made erroneous findings in assessing the alleged loss or damage – reflective loss principles – principles relevant to breach of fiduciary duties – where no material non-compliance with the rule in Browne v Dunn – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 500 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 140
Cases cited: Allied Pastoral Holdings Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1983] 1 NSWLR 1 Banque Commerciale SA, en liquidation v Akhil Holdings Limited (1990) 169 CLR 279 Betfair Pty Ltd v Racing New South Wales (2010) 189 FCR 356 Boardman v Phipps [1967] 2 AC 46 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 Carter v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2020) 279 FCR 83 Central Coast Council v Norcross Pictorial Calendars Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCA 75; 391 ALR 157 Central Innovation Pty Ltd v Garner (No 4) [2020] FCA 1796 Commonwealth Securities Ltd v South Pacific Securities Pty Ltd [2003] NSWCA 199 Devries v Australian National Railways Commission (1993) 177 CLR 472 Flightdeck Geelong Pty Ltd v All Options Pty Ltd (2020) 280 FCR 479 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118 Francuziak v Minister for Justice (2015) 238 FCR 332 George Fischer (Great Britain) Ltd v Multi Construction Ltd [1995] BCC 310; 1 BCLC 260 Gerber Garment Technology Inc v Lectra Systems Ltd [1997] RPC 443 Gould v Mount Oxide Mines Ltd (in liq) (1916) 22 CLR 490 Hospital Products Ltd v United States Surgical Corporation (1984) 156 CLR 41 Johnson v Gore Wood & Co (a firm) [2002] 2 AC 1 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Lee v Lee (2019) 266 CLR 129 Masterton Homes Pty Ltd v Palm Assets Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 234; 261 ALR 382 NRM Corporation Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2016] FCAFC 98 Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd (No 2) [1982] Ch 204 Stefanovski v Digital Central Australia (Assets) Pty Ltd [2018] FCAFC 31; 368 ALR 607 Sullivan v Trilogy Funds Management Ltd (2017) 255 FCR 503 Vale v Sutherland (2009) 237 CLR 638 Warren v Coombes (1979) 142 CLR 531 Willoughby v Clayton Utz [2005] WASC 47; 193 FLR 373
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate