Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Minister for the Environment v Sharma (No 2) [2022] FCAFC 65 Appeal from: Sharma by her litigation representative Sister Marie Brigid Arthur v Minister for the Environment [2021] FCA 560 Sharma by her litigation representative Sister Marie Brigid Arthur v Minister for the Environment (No 2) [2021] FCA 774
File number: VID 389 of 2021
Judgment of: ALLSOP CJ, BEACH AND WHEELAHAN JJ
Date of orders: 14 April 2022
Date of publication of reasons: 22 April 2022
Catchwords: REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDINGS – whether orders should be made that proceeding not continue as a representative proceeding
Legislation: Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) ss 130, 133 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 23 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 1.32, 9.21, 9.22, 9.61
Cases cited: Blair v Curran [1939] HCA 23; 62 CLR 464 Carnie v Essanda Finance Corporation Ltd [1995] HCA 9; 182 CLR 398 Minister for the Environment v Sharma [2022] FCAFC 35 Muldoon v Melbourne City Council [2013] FCA 994; 217 FCR 450 Sharma by her litigation representative Sister Marie Brigid Arthur v Minister for the Environment [2021] FCA 560; 391 ALR 1 Sharma by her litigation representative Sister Marie Brigid Arthur v Minister for the Environment (No 2) [2021] FCA 774
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate