Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Gibson v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] FCAFC 94 Appeal from: Gibson v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCCA 2731
File number: VID 704 of 2020
Judgment of: LOGAN, SC DERRINGTON AND MCEVOY JJ
Date of judgment: 11 May 2022
Catchwords: COSTS – where appellant discontinued appeal following receipt of further invitation to make representations under s 501CA of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether costs on discontinuance of appeal should be paid by appellant in accordance with Rule 36.73(4) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – whether costs order adverse to appellants in Federal Circuit Court on remitter from High Court should be disturbed – where appeal had no practical utility upon receipt of further invitation to make representations – where both parties acted reasonably in prosecuting appeal until date of invitation to make further representations – where proceeding in the Federal Circuit Court argued on different grounds to those agitated on appeal – where no reason to disturb cost order in court below – appellant ordered to pay costs of the appeal on and from date of receipt of further invitation to make representations
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 43, 501, 501CA Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 36.73
Cases cited: EPL20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 173 Gibson v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCCA 2731; (2020) 358 FLR 15 Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs; Ex Parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622 Sillars v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 174
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate