Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
KXXH v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 111 Appeal from: KXXH v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1229
File number: NSD 1172 of 2021
Judgment of: BROMBERG, JACKSON AND FEUTRILL JJ
Date of judgment: 1 July 2022
Catchwords: MIGRATION - application for revocation of mandatory visa cancellation - delegate refused application - refusal affirmed by Administrative Appeals Tribunal - application for judicial review of Tribunal's decision dismissed - appeal ground asserting failure by Tribunal to give lawful consideration to interests of minor children - principles of jurisdictional error for failure to adequately consider a matter - approach to inferences as to reality of consideration by Tribunal - emphasis given to minor children's interests by Tribunal reflected emphasis in material before Tribunal, including appellant's representations - appeal dismissed
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 43 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 499, 501, 501CA
Cases cited: Appellant V324 of 2004 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 259 Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 184; (2003) 236 FCR 593; (2003) 75 ALD 630 Ayoub v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 83; (2015) 231 FCR 513 BVD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] HCA 34; (2019) 268 CLR 29 Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 107; (2017) 252 FCR 352 Minister for Home Affairs v Omar [2019] FCAFC 188; (2019) 272 FCR 589 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Maioha [2018] FCAFC 216; (2018) 267 FCR 643 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZRKT [2013] FCA 317; (2013) 212 FCR 99 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6; (1996) 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30; (2001) 206 CLR 323 Navoto v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 135 Plaintiff M1/2021 v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 17 Savaiinaea v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 56 Singh v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 3; (2019) 267 FCR 200 Soliman v University of Technology, Sydney [2012] FCAFC 146; (2012) 207 FCR 277 SZTMD v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 150; (2015) 150 ALD 34 Uelese v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] HCA 15; (2015) 256 CLR 203 Viane v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 116; (2018) 263 FCR 531
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate