Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Au v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 125 Appeal from: Au v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1240
File number: SAD 191 of 2021
Judgment of: PERRY, DERRINGTON AND O'SULLIVAN JJ
Date of judgment: 2 August 2022
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from Federal Court dismissing application for judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Tribunal) affirming delegate's decision made under s 501CA(4) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) not to revoke mandatory visa cancellation under s 501(3A) – where primary judge held the Tribunal had erred in failing to consider whether it was satisfied of "another reason" for revocation for the purposes of s 501CA(4)(b)(ii) – where first respondent's notice of contention contended that the Tribunal had asked itself the correct question by virtue of applying Direction No 79 – where Tribunal had treated the matter as the exercise of a purely discretionary power to revoke or not revoke the cancellation decision – whether primary judge erred in finding that the Tribunal's error was not material – where notice of contention dismissed – where Tribunal's error in failing to address the correct question was material to the outcome because there was a realistic possibility of a different outcome – where Tribunal's error therefore affected by jurisdictional error – appeal allowed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 65, 91WA, 499, 501, 501CA Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs (Cth), Direction No. 79: Visa Refusal and Cancellation under s501 and Revocation of a Mandatory Cancellation of a Visa under s501CA (20 December 2018)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate