Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia HRZN v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 133 Appeal from: HRZN v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1431
File number(s): VID 773 of 2021
Judgment of: YATES, ABRAHAM AND MCELWAINE JJ
Date of judgment: 9 August 2022
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from the decision of the Federal Court of Australia – where the Federal Court dismissed the application for review of the decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – where the Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirmed the delegate's decision not to revoke cancellation of visa – whether representation was clearly articulated or clearly emerged from the materials – whether Administrative Appeals Tribunal's misunderstanding of Australia's unenacted international refoulement obligations amounted to jurisdictional error – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 499, 501, 501CA
Cases cited: AB v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 96 ALD 53; [2007] FCA 910 Appellant S395/2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 216 CLR 473; [2003] HCA 71 Applicant A v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 190 CLR 225; [1997] HCA 4 Applicant S v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2004) 217 CLR 387; [2004] HCA 25 Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163; [1995] HCA 58 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 264 CLR 123; [2018] HCA 34 HRZN v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1431 Minister for Home Affairs v Omar (2019) 272 FCR 589; [2019] FCAFC 188 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Ibrahim (2000) 204 CLR 1; [2002] HCA 55 MQGT v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant services and Multicultural Affairs (2020) 282 FCR 285; [2020] FCAFC 215 NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) (2004) 144 FCR 1; [2004] FCAFC 263 Plaintiff M1/2021 v Minister for Home Affairs (2022) 400 ALR 417; [2022] HCA 17 Probuild Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v Shade Systems Pty Ltd (2018) 264 CLR 1; [2018] HCA 4 R v Connell; Ex parte Hetton Bellbird Collieries Ltd (1944) 69 CLR 407; [1944] HCA 2 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; ex parte Lam (2003) 214 CLR 1; [2003] HCA 6 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Miah (2001) 206 CLR 57; [2001] HCA 22 Snedden v Minister for Justice (2014) 230 FCR 82; [2014] FCAFC 156 Wei v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 257 CLR 22; [2015] HCA 51
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate