Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Ali v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 140 Appeal from: Ali v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 174
File number: NSD 222 of 2022
Judgment of: YATES, BROMWICH AND MCELWAINE JJ
Date of judgment: 26 August 2022
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from primary judge dismissing an application for judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – Tribunal affirmed delegate's decision not to revoke mandatory cancellation of visa pursuant to s 501(3A) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether Tribunal made irrelevant or illogical considerations – whether Tribunal failed to give probative weight to evidence – Held: appeal dismissed PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to rely upon entirely new grounds of review for the first time on appeal to the Full Court – Held: application dismissed – insufficient merit to warrant the grant of leave
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 499, 501(6)(h)
Cases cited: DHX17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 127; 278 FCR 475 FUD18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 48; 168 ALD 474 MBJY v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 11; 284 FCR 152 Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v EYR19 [2021] FCAFC 133; 285 FCR 540 Tohi v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 125; 285 FCR 187 Tu'uta Katoa v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] HCA 28
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate