Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Lopez v Gold Titan Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] FCAFC 146 File number(s): NSD 34 of 2022
Judgment of: RARES, STEWART AND GOODMAN JJ
Date of judgment: 29 August 2022
Catchwords: COSTS – whether costs should be payable now or following delivery of further reasons by the primary judge – whether the successful appellants should pay the respondent's costs on issues not determined by the Court – whether the amount payable by the respondent should be reduced by reason of the unsatisfactory nature of the Appeal Book produced by the appellants – whether the respondent should be granted a certificate under the Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 (Cth)
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 37M and 37N Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 36.54 Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 (Cth), ss 3 and 6
Cases cited: Lopez v Gold Titan Pty Ltd [2022] FCAFC 117 North East Equity Pty Ltd v Proud Nominees Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCAFC 15 North East Equity Pty Ltd v Proud Nominees Pty Ltd [2010] FCAFC 60; 269 ALR 262 Northern Territory v Sangare [2019] HCA 25; 265 CLR 164 Secretary, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment v Tasmanian Aboriginal Centre Incorporated (No 2) [2016] FCAFC 137
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance
Number of paragraphs: 17
Date of last submissions: 3 August 2022
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate