Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Evans [2022] FCAFC 182 Appeal from: Regina v Evans (No 1) [2021] NFSC 2
File number: QUD 216 of 2021
Judgment of: ALLSOP CJ, WIGNEY AND BROMWICH JJ
Date of judgment: 17 November 2022
Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Crown appeal against sentence – where Crown seeks to have conditions to a recognisance set aside, as being beyond power, but to leave the sentence imposed otherwise intact – where no formal arrangement entered into by Norfolk Island to permit an order in the nature of home detention for federal offenders under the regime in s 20AB of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) – whether the primary judge erred in finding that there is power in s (20)(1)(a)(iv) instead of s 20AB of the Crimes Act to impose a condition amounting to home detention in a recognisance release order for federal offences – Held: recognisance did not impose a sentence amounting to home detention – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Pt IB; ss 20(1), 20(1)(a), 20(1)(b), 20(1)(b)(i), 20(1)(a)(iv), 20AB, 20AB(1AA)(a), 20AB(1AA)(c) Crimes Regulation 2019 (Cth) reg 15 Sentencing Act 2007 (NI) s 43
Cases cited: Adams v Carr (1987) 47 SASR 205 Anthony Hordern & Sons Ltd v Amalgamated Clothing and Allied Trades Union of Australia (1932) 47 CLR Boensch v Pascoe [2019] HCA 49; 268 CLR 593 Dimech v Watts [2016] ACTSC 221 Isaacs v McKinnon (1949) 80 CLR 502 R v Shambayati (1999) 105 A Crim R 373
Division: General Division
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate