Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Philip Morris Ltd v Comptroller-General of Customs [2022] FCAFC 185 Appeal from: Philip Morris v Comptroller-General of Customs [2022] AATA 548
File number(s): VID 209 of 2022
Judgment of: LOGAN, THAWLEY AND HESPE JJ
Date of judgment: 24 November 2022
Catchwords: TAXATION – where applicant made applications for drawbacks pursuant to the Customs Act 1901 (Cth) and Customs (International Obligations) Regulation 2015 (Cth) – whether applicant gave notice in writing of intention to claim drawbacks as required by items 7(a) of s 37 of the Regulation – where applicant had made export declaration notices – whether notice of intention to claim drawbacks could be inferred from export declaration notices and surrounding circumstances – applicant did not comply with item 7(a) of s 37, substantially or at all – whether respondent had discretion to pay drawback notwithstanding non-compliance with items 7(a) of s 37 – no discretion to pay drawbacks – application dismissed
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Customs Act 1901 (Cth) ss 8, 113, 113AA, 114, 114A, 114B, 168 Customs (International Obligations) Regulation 2015 (Cth) ss 34, 37, 38 Legislation Act 2003 (Cth) s 13
Cases cited: Emanuele v Australian Securities Commission [1997] HCA 20; 188 CLR 114 Philip Morris v Comptroller-General of Customs [2022] AATA 548 Project Blue Sky v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; 194 CLR 355 Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v Health Minders Pty Ltd (1987) 9 NSWLR 673 Sun v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 52; 243 FCR 220 Williams v Nicoski [2003] WASC 131 Woods v Bate (1986) 7 NSWLR 560
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate