Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Sunlite Australia Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2023] FCAFC 43 Appeal from: XQDX and Commissioner of Taxation [2021] AATA 4070
File number: WAD 269 of 2021
Judgment of: COLVIN, O'SULLIVAN AND FEUTRILL JJ
Date of judgment: 21 March 2023
Catchwords: TAXATION - appeal against decision of the Australian Administrative Appeals Tribunal - where Commissioner conducted an audit and issued amended assessments - where Commissioner disallowed objection - where Tribunal upheld Commissioner's decision save as to the shortfall penalty - where appeal brought under s 44 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) - where applicant contends that the Tribunal erred in its construction of s 355-205 Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) - where applicant contends that as a result of error in construction the Tribunal failed to determine the main issue - where respondent disputes both grounds - where respondent maintains that proceedings are incompetent as applicant seeks to raise new matters - where applicant claims entitlement to notional deduction pursuant to Income Tax Assessment Act Division 355 - where tax offset may be available for R&D entities which incur R&D expenditure - consideration of meaning of entity under Income Tax Assessment Act - consideration of circumstances in which Court on appeal from Tribunal may make factual findings - appeal dismissed
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) ss 355-35, 355-205, 355-210, 950-100, 960-100, Division 355 Industry Research and Development Act 1986 (Cth) s 27A
Cases cited: Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory Revenue [2009] HCA 41; (2009) 239 CLR 27 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Yazaki Corporation [2018] FCAFC 73; (2018) 262 FCR 243 Brooks v Commissioner of Taxation [2000] FCA 721; (2000) 100 FCR 117 Burton v Commissioner of Taxation [2019] FCAFC 141; (2019) 271 FCR 548 Channel Pastoral Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2015] FCAFC 57; (2015) 232 FCR 162 Commissioner of State Revenue v ACN 005 057 349 Pty Ltd [2017] HCA 6; (2017) 261 CLR 509 Commissioner of Taxation v Auctus Resources Pty Ltd [2021] FCAFC 39; (2021) 284 FCR 294 Kelly v The Queen [2004] HCA 12; (2004) 218 CLR 216 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v WZAPN [2015] HCA 22; (2015) 254 CLR 610 Moreton Bay Regional Council v Mekpine Pty Ltd [2016] HCA 7; (2016) 256 CLR 437 Osland v Secretary to the Department of Justice [2010] HCA 24; (2010) 241 CLR 320 Owners of the Ship, 'Shin Kobe Maru' v Empire Shipping Co Inc (1994) 181 CLR 404 Roy Morgan Research Centre Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue (Vic) [2001] HCA 49; (2001) 207 CLR 72 SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] HCA 34; (2017) 262 CLR 362
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate