Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Sino Group International Limited v Toddler Kindy Gymbaroo Pty Ltd [2023] FCAFC 110 Appeal from: Sino Group International Limited v Toddler Sino Group International Limited v Toddler Kindy Gymbaroo Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 630
File number: VID 371 of 2022
Judgment of: FARRELL, CHEESEMAN AND FEUTRILL JJ
Date of judgment: 14 July 2023
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – deed of company arrangement – application to terminate deed of company arrangement pursuant to s 445D(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – where primary judge not satisfied discretion to terminate deed of company arrangement (DOCA) enlivened – whether House v R error by primary judge – whether discretion to terminate DOCA enlivened – whether discretion should be exercised to terminate DOCA – Held: appeal allowed, DOCA terminated. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to adduce further evidence under s 27 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – where evidence not before primary judge – whether if evidence produced at hearing below it would likely have produced a different result – whether to exercise discretion to admit evidence – Held: allowed in part
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 445D; Sch 2, Insolvency Practice Schedule (Corporations) 2016 (Cth) ss 75-41 and 90-15 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 27 Insolvency Practice Rules (Corporations) 2016 (Cth) s 75-115
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate